Izetbegović’s discourse is filled with the examples of violation of all key values of moral-discursive matrix of language: for instance, we find many contradictory statements concerning essential issues and aspects of BiH politics; the statement on civil, ethnically unmarked BiH in parallel with the statement on BiH-Moslems as a foundational, and even majority, people to BiH who can claim some special rights over the state; or the expression of the wish to accept the condition of war with the aim of defending Bosnia’s full sovereignty in the sense of an undivided rule; but also the expression of readiness to arrange the relations within BiH in accordance with both Serb and Croat interests.
Archives
⚏Analysis
Theory of dediscoursification and implementation of Dayton peace as continuation of the state of war
- Elections as the means of discrimination against BiH Croats
- Why has Bonn-powered High Representative never been a sign of progress for Bosnia-Herzegovina: four reflections
- Democracy, democratic representation, and constitutional logic of ethnic electoral units in Bosnia-Herzegovina
- Strengthening of the role of European Union and Germany in Bosnia and Herzegovina – continuity of the reforms in wrong direction or U-turn in accordance with the European Parliament Resolution?
- On an analysis by Konrad Adenauer Stiftung that should have remained unpublished
- Multiethnic reflections on an unjustifiably suppressed and repeatedly violated Dayton agreement
- Three Federal Units for Three Political Communities – Exit Strategy of the International Crisis Group (ICG) from Bosnia and Herzegovina
- On some disconcerting aspects of American foreign policy towards Bosnia-Herzegovina –
⚏News
European Parliament resolution of 6 February 2014 on the 2013 progress report on Bosnia and Herzegovina
